“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any in the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after far they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last noticed.
Delay in recording confessional statement may not be treated fatal for the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
four. It's been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of one day within the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained by the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness with the alleged occurrence as well as prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram transpired to become the real brothers of the deceased but they didn't respond at all towards the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on countless instances that extra judicial confession of an accused is really a weak kind of evidence which could possibly be manoeuvred from the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners with each other over a motorcycle at four.
When there is not any prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds minimal sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent inside the home state, relevant case law from another state can be regarded by the court.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it is unclear how it relates to any presented situation, usually rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances on the case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal assist might be high priced and tricky to obtain.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that whilst contemplating the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must evaluate the merit of all the suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates that are found to be most meritorious among them. Considering that the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored from the respondent department just to increase favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part of your respondent department.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This example of case law refers to 2 cases read within the state court, with the same level.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its primary purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners could seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same kind of case.
Because of this, just citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling somebody to inform them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in such-and-such community, without actually providing them an address. Driving around the neighborhood attempting to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than it’s value.
competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them to european company law text cases and materials become suit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)